Overthunk: “Contagion” and the Rule of Law

“Contagion” could have done a better job exploring how the military prevented total societal collapse.

[Blanket Spoiler Alert for Contagion. Not that it’s really the type of movie that’s prone to spoiling, but nevertheless, consider yourself notified.]

I like movies about the apocalypse. More specifically, I enjoy seeing the collapse of Western Civilization play out on screen, whether it’s the result of zombies, global warming, SkyNet, or, in the case of Steven Soderbergh’s new thriller Contagion, infectious disease. Contagion is the latest in a long line of stories that we tell about our own demise to explore the fragile state of our way of life.

Except…that…

It isn’t one of those stories. In spite of the visuals in the trailer that suggest societal collapse–angry mobs, overwhelmed emergency rooms, uncollected garbage–the social fabric remains intact. Vaccines are distributed in an orderly, chaos-free manner. The mob scenes from the middle act of the movie give way to an eery sense of calm and isolation. The teenage girl gets an ersatz “prom” in her living room. The same teenage girl who can text on her iPhone throughout the movie because the cell infrastructure remains intact throughout.

I wasn’t necessarily disappointed by this outcome, but I was definitely not expecting it based on the trailer and the first half of the movie. Consider the following from the movie:

  • A frenzied mob send a chair flying through the glass divider at a pharmacy and stampedes for a limited supply of a homeopathic (and ultimately ineffective) treatment for the disease.
  • A frenzied mob overruns emergency authorities after they announce to the crowd that they’ve run out of food rations.
  • Law enforcement agencies report a 25% absentee rate, meaning cops are either too sick or too scared to show up to do their jobs.
  • The comfort of affluent suburban life gives way to looted storefronts, home invasions, and, worst of all, Matt Damon breaking into a neighbor’s abandoned house and arming himself with a double-barreled shotgun.

These are all unmistakable signs of a breakdown of law and order. The powerful forces in our society that keep such behavior in check–threat of state violence and social norms–are overwhelmed by the desperation of those who feel they have nothing to lose.

And yet, about halfway through the movie, the chaos starts to give way to an uneasy sense of authority and order. Where does it come from?

The military.

The military enforces the closed state borders. The military keeps the queues at the vaccination centers orderly. The military preserves law and order when all other methods of preserving it have failed.

The fact that the military plays this role is far from surprising. But it also goes almost completely unexamined in a movie that was otherwise fairly adept at examining the myriad effects of a catastrophic disease outbreak on our society. Fortunately, when the movie ends, the Overthinking begins. Let’s speculate on a few of the issues that should have been at play based on the events of Contagion. 

Keep in mind that the same forces tearing away at society at large would also be at play with the military. Large numbers of troops would be keeling over and dying, and those that weren’t getting sick would certainly be hearing about their civilian friends and family succumbing to the disease. Would the military be hit by the same 25% reduction in capacity that the police were? Perhaps not, particularly among active duty personnel, but what about reservists called up in the thousands? How many would ignore the call and choose to stay with their loved ones? Probably more than a few, given the fact that mild mannered Matt Damon felt the need to arm himself.

And once those troops were assembled, how would they show the force required to keep the desperate mobs in check? Would they heed orders to fire on civilians? An even if they did, would it matter? Consider the tense border scene in which Matt Damon yells at the soldier, “I’m not sick!” There were hundreds, if not thousands, of similarly angry and upset people behind him. Enough to possibly overwhelm a small military outfit, even one that chose to fire on a crowd.

Ultimately, though, Contagion is a movie about The System working well enough to pull humanity through the crisis, even if at times The System seems to be inadequate to the task at hand. If the desperation dial must go past a certain level to give enough people the feeling that they truly have nothing to lose to overwhelm any and all shows of force, then Contagion kept that dial below that point, wherever it may be.

But this, to me, was the most interesting thing to consider about the scenario presented by Contagion: how close were they to that line? What were the individual decisions that soliders up and down the hierarchy made that prevented society from breaking down, when that’s clearly where things were headed without their intervention?

And most importantly, how did the military keep the hand sanitizer supply lines running to their troops?

So many unanswered questions. But that’s what we’re here for! Duke it out in the comments. Would Contagion have been a more interesting movie if the role of the military were more closely examined (or examined at all)? Could the U.S. Military maintain nationwide martial law while a quarter of its members were dying of a real bad flu? And seriously, when the nation inevitably ran out of Purell, wouldn’t everybody have seriously freaked out?

13 Comments on “Overthunk: “Contagion” and the Rule of Law”

  1. Brian #

    This is purely to condition the mindset that Martial Law works. So when it needs to happen, people meekly obey. You will not see a hollywood movie that depicts the Strong Central Government as the bumbling incompetant fools they really are, they won’t let it through.

    Reply

    • Johnny Nitro #

      The overall vibe I got from the movie was it’s not just up to the military to maintain order, that all the civilians are responsible for some base level understanding of each others situations and cooperation between themselves and can’t rely on the military to act as connector between them and to get frustrated at the military for not doing so and rioting is dodging your personal responsibility to the community.

      We never see the military lay down justice on the rioters because the point is emphasizing personal responsibility. That martial law will only happen when people start believing and acting like the military/police force is solely responsible to check everyone’s behavior instead of themselves.

      Reply

    • Kain424 #

      Well, the old Romero flick THE CRAZIES is about how the military would ultimately make things worse and quite possibly doom us all.

      Reply

  2. jjsaul #

    The self-limiting nature of rapidly lethal viruses with short incubation periods has saved us from this possibility with Marburg and Ebola. If it comes down to civilians voluntarily obeying a quarantine, and keeping their children inside a hot zone when they don’t see any symptoms, not a chance.

    Pretty scary. Good thing there haven’t been a few dozen fishy deaths of microbiologists in the last few decades or I’d really get concerned.

    Reply

    • L33tminion #

      Ha ha.

      If you need me, I’ll just be huddling in the corner.

      Reply

  3. Steven #

    After reading the title of this post, did anyone else think this would be about Jude Law’s role in the film?

    Reply

    • Lee OTI Staff #

      Fair point. But if you’d like, we can talk about his character in relation to the, ahem, rule of law. I was honestly surprised that he was given due process after his arrest; i.e., that he was allowed to make bail. If martial law were truly in place, the government could have just locked him up and be done with him, no?

      Reply

      • LazerCorba6900 #

        Yeah I thought there was going to be a graph showing the statistical law Jude Law follows when choosing acting roles.

        I didn’t even think about having due process as weird until you mentioned it, but it did surprise me he made bail with donations from his millions of fans, and by surprise I mean aggravate. It reminded me of those doomsday cults when the end day comes and goes they take it as further confirmation of their belief. That logic is shown through every sub plot in the movie though, the not throwing out a whole system of belief over one error.

        Like with Jude Law’s character you could say it’s horrible that the government allows wackos like him to spread all this misinformation, but that’s kinda the risk you take with freedom of speech and there’s controls in place to limit it’s abuse, when money is involved, so let’s not tear the whole thing down because you hate the guy’s snaggle tooth. Accepting that someone you hate is gonna get out on bail is part of living with the system that provides the most freedom for the most people, that it’s not inherently corrupt just because it doesn’t perfectly align with your personal whim. It is stark contrast to most disaster movies which live out the fantasy of being able to lay justice on any asshat that wears his asshat at the wrong angle.

        Reply

  4. tesla #

    smallbox returns for the white man !

    Reply

  5. Tom P #

    I thought it might be a dim view on how unequipped for natural survival we (and, in fairness, much of the West) currently are. For instance, why even confront the military at a well guarded border? I think a lot of us just want to know someone is in charge when we don’t know what to do.

    I think the only city that could be effectively quarantined is New York.

    Reply

  6. Benjamin R. #

    Did the film even address the fact that the Army is prohibited, by the Posse Comitatus Act, from providing domestic law enforcement?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

    This was passed after the Civil War, to assure the Southern states that the federal government could not exert its power through the military. Interestingly, in 2006 a law was passed that would have granted an exemption in the case of a “serious public health emergency”, but that was repealed in 2008.

    Reply

    • Johnny Nitro #

      I don’t remember it being mentioned but just might have missed it. The wikipedia page says the National Guard can be used by the governor to enforce civil order in an emergency though.

      Reply

Add a Comment