Overthinking BSG: Episodes 1.9-2.4

Overthinking BSG: Episodes 1.9-2.4

Talking about politics in BSG.

season 2As I’ve mentioned several times before, I like the reimagined Battlestar Galactica series—but I don’t love it.  Yes, yes, I know.  I’m wrong.  BSG is the best TV show ever.  I fracked up.

This week on Overthinking BSG (a.k.a. Mlawski’s fortnightly attempt to discover why she doesn’t like the show as much as she theoretically should), I’m going to talk politics.  My theory for this week: I’d like the show better if I were a neo-con living in 2004.  Which I’m not.

Warning: politics within.

Episode Recaps

A quick note: I was unaware of how short season one of Battlestar Galactica actually is, so I ended up watching some of season two so I had a full eight episodes to write about.

Episode 1.9 (“Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down”):
In this episode Battlestar Galactica: The Sitcom, Colonel Tigh’s wacky drunk wife, Ellen, who may or may not be a Cylon, comes to the BSG to awkward things up, while Baltar, who isn’t telling anyone that Boomer is a Cylon for some unknown reason, and who isn’t telling anyone whether or not Tigh’s wife is a Cylon for some unknown reason, has imaginary sex with his imaginary robot friend. There was something off about this episode to me.

Episode 1.10 (“The Hand of God”):
I once read that there’s a guideline for writing a likable TV show, and it goes like this: if you write about a group of characters who mostly like each other working together to solve a difficult and important problem, your show will be immediately likable.  This episode was the first BSG episode to follow that guideline and, as such, I finally had some fun watching a BSG episode.

In this episode, President Roslin starts hallucinating and comes to the conclusion that she’s an instrument of god.  Baltar continues hallucinating and comes to the conclusion that he’s an instrument of god.  The members of the cast without messiah complexes work together to take down a Cylon base so they can get the fuel they need to continue their journey.  Despite all odds, they succeed!  Hooray!  Is this episode deep and philosophical?  Maybe not.  But goshdarnit, I liked it.

Episode 1.11 (“Colonial Day”): Hey, remember how there was an episode earlier in the season about some convicts on a prison ship?  Well, they’re back!  At least, Tom Zarek, their revolutionary leader, is back.  Good job, show.  I approve of continuity.

Tom Zarek has been elected the representative from Sagittaron, and he demands that the seat of VP be filled.  Naturally, he’s running for the spot.  Pres. Roslin and Commander Adama do not want a former terrorist a heartbeat away from the presidency, regardless of the fact that Zarek actually seems to have some practical ideas on how to run a post-apocalyptic society.  (Tom Zarek for President of the Colonies!  Admit it.  A twist like that would make the show a lot more interesting.)  Luckily for Roslin, the sometimes-charismatic AND TOTALLY NOT INSANE Gaius Baltar is there to run against Zarek.  Baltar wins the election.  I mean, of course, he does.  Baltar’s a hottie.

An aside: I also liked this episode.  Even though the Colonial political system appears to be…well, the word “stupid” comes to mind, I appreciated the fact that the show actually took some time off from the “blow up the Cylons” plot to talk about the nitty-gritty of post-apocalyptic politics and economics.  If the show moves in this direction a little more, I may be more interested.

Episode 1.12-13 (“Kobol’s Last Gleaming”): It’s season finale time, so lots of things happen all at once.  Boomer 1 considers killing herself; Baltar convinces her to go through with it.  (She’s ok.)  The humans discover Kobol, their mythical ancestral homeland.  Pres. Roslin, who is now completely certain she’s a religious figure, convinces Starbuck to return to Caprica to find the prophecied “Arrow of Apollo” so she (Roslin) can lead humanity to Earth.  When Adama finds out that Roslin took over military property for some wacky religious reasons, he stages a coup.  But Lee believes in the rule of law and pulls a gun on Col. Tigh, which gets him and Pres. Roslin sent to the brig.

Meanwhile, Baltar, the Chief, and some others are on their way to survey Kobol when their ship gets attacked by Cylons.  Now they’re stranded on Kobol.  While Baltar is unconscious, Number Six gives Baltar a vision of their robo-baby, and they make out in his mind.  At Adama’s order, Boomer 1 goes to nuke the giant Cylon ship above Kobol.  On the ship, she meets a load of other, naked-er Boomers.  Then when she returns home, she shoots Adama twice in the chest.  On Caprica, Starbuck finds the Arrow of Apollo, kills a copy of Number Six, and finds Helo and Boomer 2.  Helo is now aware that Boomer 2 is a Cylon but is keeping her alive because she claims she’s pregnant with his child.  What’s with all the robot-human hybrid babies, show?  Is this the Cylons’ “plan”?  Miscegenation?  They do realize they could have done that without killing 99% of the human race, don’t they?

Episode 2.1 (“Scattered”):
In our season 2 opener, Tigh becomes the acting-commander of the BSG while Adama’s critical.  Tigh orders that the BSG and the fleet FTL away from the Cylons, but the BSG and the fleet manage to jump to separate coordinates.  Whoops.  The BSG has to jump back to Kobol, where a bazillion Cylons are waiting, and network their computers to figure out where the rest of the fleet is.  Trouble is, Cylons can totally virus up networked computers.  Through the power of luck and the fact that the nature of this show requires that humanity survive the beginning of the second season, the BSG gets the coordinates in time and jumps over to the rest of the fleet.  But some Cylons have infiltrated the ship!  Dun dun dunnn!

Meanwhile, on Kobol, the Chief, Cally, and some random redshirt get caught under Cylon fire while trying to find an extra medkit.  (Guess who bites it.)  On Caprica, Boomer 2 steals Starbuck’s ride.

Episode 2.2 (“Valley of Darkness”): My notes say: “If Billy, Dee, and Commander Adama had a threesome, would it be called the Billy-Dee-William?”  Nice.  The BSG’s power is mostly out due to the Cylon virus, plus there are Cylon centurions rampaging around the ship.  They look like this:

For DK.

For DK.

Lee, Billy, and some other people boom-headshot them to death.  Adama’s still critical from Boomer 1’s assassination attempt, Starbuck and Helo are having some chill-out time on Caprica, and Chief Tyrol euthanizes another poor redshirt.

Episode 2.3 (“Fragged”): On Kobol, Lt. Crashdown decides to take down some Cylons who are almost done building an anti-aircraft gun.  Chief Tyrol and Baltar think this is a Bad Idea.  The show obviously wants me to side with them, too, but, frankly, if they had a better plan than Crashdown’s, why didn’t they say it?  What, were they just planning on hiding in the woods forever?  Personally, I think it’s better to take a risk on a potentially-suicidal mission that could lead to rescue than to stand around some uninhabited planet waiting for the Cylons to find you.  But that’s just me.  Fortunately, Crashdown jumps off the slippery slope and threatens Cally with a gun, forcing Baltar to shoot him in the head.  Lee comes to save the day and pick up the few living maroonees.

Back on the BSG, the incarcerated Roslin’s started acting crazy from withdrawal from her cancer meds, so Lady Macbeth (a.k.a. Mrs. Ellen Tigh) tells her hubby to let the Quorum of Twelve see what’s become of their president.  Unfortunately for our favorite stressed-out alcoholic, Roslin gets her meds just in time, gets lucid, and reveals the the Quorum that she is an Instrument of God.  In response, Tigh declares martial law.

Episode 2.4 (“Resistance”): Some passenger ships have been striking and protesting Col. Tigh’s martial law, so he sics the army on em.  I expect to hear strains of CSNY’s “Ohio” in the background, but, sadly, Caprica seems to have not had a classic rock period in its past.  The Chief, back home on the BSG after his happy fun times on Kobol, is put in the brig with his super ex-girlfriend, Boomer 1.  Baltar administers a lethal dose of something to Tyrol to get Boomer 1 to reveal how many more Cylons are in the fleet.  The answer—which I thought Baltar already knew from the miniseries?—is eight.  Cally shoots Boomer 1 to death, and Tyrol, who was administered the antidote to the poison, is sad.  Meanwhile, Lee and Dee (hey, that rhymes!) break Pres. Roslin out of jail and hide her with her favoritest person in the world, Tom Zarek.  (Behind the scenes note: I almost accidentally typed “Tom Servo.”)  On Caprica, Helo and Starbuck run into a group of sci-fi basketball players and survivalists.

roslin

Cylons and Neo-cons

What I understand from the Internet is that the reimagined BSG was very popular with neo-conservative viewers when it began in 2004.  A conservative could read an allegory about noble, heroic humans (read: Westerners, particularly Americans) fighting shifty religious terrorists who want to destroy Everything We Stand For (read: Cylons).  These viewers could cheer when Starbuck tortured a Cylon for information or when the Colony president started obsessively reading the Bible and proclaimed herself an instrument of the Lords.  They could understand why Tigh declared martial law, and they could understand why Commander Adama blithely walked out of a trial even after he was legally obligated to be there.

The trouble is, I am not a neo-con, and I’m not living in 2004.  So far, there are no heroes in this show for me, a liberal living in 2009, to cling to.  Let’s take a look at the major political players in the BSG universe.  On the right we have:

Commander Adama

  • Doesn’t believe in the rule of law.  He walked out of that tribunal and was able to get away with it because the men with guns were on his side.
  • Doesn’t believe in democracy.  He staged a military coup just because President Roslin made one stupid decision.
  • Makes monumental military decisions based on emotion rather than reason.  For instance, he sent the whole fleet of Raptors on a search and rescue mission to find Starbuck when they were needed to, you know, protect the human race from the Cylons.

Colonel Tigh

  • Too quick to declare martial law.
  • Refuses to listen to the will of the people—ever.  For details, see the episode where he was putting down peaceful protests by sending in idiots with guns.

President Roslin

  • Doesn’t seem to like democracy all that much.  Did you see that look on her face when she heard she’d have to run for reelection in a year?  Yeah, something tells me that’s not going to happen.
  • Makes pivotal decisions based on her interpretation of the Bible.
  • Seems not to care much about any political issues except those related to national security.  As Tom Zarek said, she doesn’t seem to have any plans about how to fix the ruined human economy, how to provide health care for the civilians, etc.

In the center (?) we have:

Gaius Baltar

  • Doesn’t believe in anything except his own self-interest.
  • Makes political decisions based on the voices in his head, which also tell him he’s an instrument of God.

And on the left we have:

Lee Adama

  • Lawful Stupid.  Believes in the “rule of law” and “democracy” so much that he helps Roslin escape from jail so she can continue running her insane, religious dictatorship.

The Quorum of 12

  • Sheep.  First they blindly follow Tom Zarek; then, once Roslin reveals that she’s an Instrument of God, they flip-flop and start blindly following her.
  • Ineffectual.  Other than elect a (bad) VP, what have they done?  Nothing.  Nada.  Plus, there are only 12 of them, there is no proportional representation, and apparently you can be elected to the Quorum without even knowing that you’re running (see: Baltar, Gaius).  The body seems to have been designed to be completely useless as a working democratic body.

Tom Zarek

  • Blew up a government building to make a point.
  • I could be wrong, but he seems like he could turn into a dictator very easily.  He’s clearly buildling a cult of personality around himself, and his talking points about rule of law and democracy and “all that good stuff” seem to me to be pretty words to get himself into the metaphorical White House.  Once there, I wouldn’t be surprised if he just made himself king.

So, in short, our heroes are either authoritarian/fascistic (in the case of Adama, Tigh, Roslin, and possibly Tom Zarek), sociopathic (in the case of Baltar), stupid and/or ineffectual (in the case of Lee and the Quorum of 12), or crazy fringe radicals (in the case of Tom Zarek).  The other characters, the grunts like Starbuck, Chief Tyrol, Callie, Dee, Gaeta, and the rest, are just pawns in this political game, far too minor in the scheme of things to make much of a difference one way or another.

So if none of these characters can be my hero, who will be?  Who am I supposed to root for?

I know some of you readers are asking, “Why do you have to root for anyone?  Even though the characters in the show are mostly conservative politically, perhaps the show itself is liberal.  You know, like Mad Men.  Anyway, this doesn’t have to be a partisan thing.  Can’t you just enjoy watching flawed individuals from either side of the political spectrum make difficult decisions in the face of robotic adversity?”

My answer is, “Yes, but only for so long.”  The fact is, this is a television show.  I want to be entertained.  I don’t want to watch a show about people I consider basically awful doing things I consider deplorable while terrible things happen to them.*  Where’s the fun in that?  It would be like if I were a conservative forced to sit through all of The West Wing.  (At least TWW had a good helping of humor, something BSG almost completely lacks.)

One of these people is a Cylon.

One of these people is a Cylon.

Let me be fair to BSG.  At least the show is deep and ambitious enough to tackle important political questions at all.  I have to give the writers major props for trying.  The issue here is that the tough questions BSG is asking are questions I answered myself years ago.  For example, BSG asks: Is it okay to torture a Cylon?  Theoretically, this is a deep, interesting, and important question.  To me, however, this is not a hard question at all.  Not in 2009, anyway.  The answer is no.  It is not okay to torture anyone.  Period.  By this point in 2009, I’m pretty set in my views on torture, so no sci-fi TV program is going to change my mind about it.  Maybe in 2004 I would have found a BSG episode about the question of torture controversial and intriguing.  Now I yawn.  I’ve seen this question on TV, in the movies, and, sadly, in the real world many times before.

There are many parameters by which we can judge a TV show.  Here are my own personal criteria:

Question 1: Is it consistently entertaining?  Do the plots and characters hold my attention?  If criterion 1 is met, I will watch a bunch of episodes of it—maybe even a whole season.

Question 2: Is the show well-made?  Do the writing, acting, production values, and so on come together to achieve the goals of the authors?  If criteria 1 and 2 are both met, then I will probably like the show and watch it as long as it remains entertaining.  I may even recommend it to my friends.

Question 3 (the bonus question): Does the show make me think?  If the show meets this criterion, along with the other two, I will sing its praises for the rest of time.

So far, these are my answers for the new BSG series:

1. On the question of, “Does the show entertain me?” the answer is, “It’s hit or miss.”  I don’t run to watch the next episode, let’s put it that way.  The constant darkness and brutality of the show make it difficult for me to watch more than one episode at a time.  As I said above, almost all of the characters have a dramatically different worldview than I do—a worldview in which torture is A-OK, democracy never works, the needs of civilians are to be ignored, and the leaders of the military know what’s best for everyone.  While these characters are interesting to watch—kind of like the pilot of a plane in a nosedive is interesting to watch—I can’t bring myself to like these people.  Personally, I don’t really care whether most of them live or die, or which of them are really Cylons in disguise, waiting for their moment to attack.  And that’s a big problem.  It sucks all the suspense out of the show.

2. The show is mostly well-made, except for the huge, annoying plot holes.  The main actors are very good, and the music is to die.  The dialogue is unusually sharp, as well…as long as the writers don’t go for humor.  (“No more Mr. Nice Gaius”?  Really, guys?  Really?)  From a technical standpoint, BSG is a winner.

3. Does the show make me think?  As I said above, it may have set my intellectual wheels a-turning back in 2004.  In 2009, it doesn’t.  I’ve dealt with these themes before.  Too many times before.  Moreover, at this point, I’m not in the mood to watch a program that only deals with the evils of society.  I’m too early in the series to know if the show is ultimately going to espouse a liberal or conservative worldview, or whether it will ultimately condemn the less-than-ethical actions of its characters.  Either way, it’s not fun for me to watch.  Life is depressing enough now as it is.  I don’t need BSG making humanity look even worse than it already does.

So, for my sanity’s sake, I’m going to take a break from BSG for now.  In two weeks, I’m going to be writing an article for OTI’s Halloween theme week.  After that, we’ll see.  Maybe I’ll miss my nightly appointment with my BSG DVDs.  Perhaps I will become too happy and will need some cynical science-fiction to bring me back down to Earth.  Until then, consider the Overthinking BSG series on hiatus.

*Exception: HBO’s Rome.  Although almost every character in that show was an awful human being, the series was just so much fun that I didn’t mind.  Unlike BSG, Rome clearly wasn’t meant to be taken seriously.  Besides, Rome did have a few (relatively) good guys in it; Brutus and Cicero jump immediately to mind.

What do you think?  Should Mlawski give BSG another chance?  Make your case below!  …But no spoilers :)

14 Comments on “Overthinking BSG: Episodes 1.9-2.4”

  1. thinkwatchthink #

    Completely agree with the analysis of BSG’s tone. Just wasn’t enough humor for me. (That is where Rome shined.) I latched onto Baltar and Six for dear life.

    Reply

  2. Kevin #

    “…sadly, Caprica seems to have not had a classic rock period in its past.”

    Uh… just wait another month or two. We’ll have a LOT to talk about.

    Reply

  3. stokes OTI Staff #

    I have seen exactly one episode of BSG, and it was the one where Starbuck tortures the Cylon. Like you, I saw it this year. And like 2009 Mlawski, 2009 Stokes is pretty dead set against torture. So the question for me was not “is torture ok?” But it did raise some interesting questions for me, on a more metafictional level. What asked myself as I watched was: “Can I accept a torturer as the hero of a show?” That is, could I ever bring myself to like this character?

    By the end of the episode, the answer was a pretty solid yes: Starbuck seemed to have been shaken by the experience, and I’d like to believe that she would not be so quick to break out the thumbscrews next time. I would not accept her as the hero yet – she seemed pretty dang villainous – but I could see her becoming a hero. Nothing wrong with a good old fashioned redemption arc.

    But this might be a point where my experience was distorted by having only watched the one episode. From your description, I get the feeling that she’s supposed to be one of the main POV characters, and one that the audience basically roots for. Torture coming from a character like that would be a lot harder for me to accept.

    Also, I had seen basically none of the Cylon atrocities, so the question of whether the victim deserved whatever he got was never on my mind. Well, it never would have been there anyway: like I said, I’m never willing to accept torture. (I even get worried about the clever psychological torture on Burn Notice.) But because I hadn’t seen the atrocities, I never had to ask myself whether the writers were trying to make a case for torture: I just assumed that they were as dead set against it as I was, which again made the episode as a whole easier to swallow.

    Reply

  4. mlawski OTI Staff #

    @Stokes: The interesting thing is that I do like Starbuck as a character and agree with you that she seemed legitimately shaken by the whole incident. The issue is, even if the show is against torture, do I want to watch it? Is it fun for me? Ehhh not really.

    Reply

  5. Jack #

    Something for you to consider: just because conservatives embraced the show at one point (and I’m not entirely too certain how widespread that was, to be frank), doesn’t mean it was in fact directed AT them.

    BSG is not, nor do I suspect it was intended to ever be, a story that endorsed the conservative viewpoint. If it was, well, then, it would’ve started with the Colonials invading Cylon space because they were out there doing evil things and we can prove it! Your criticisms are missing a key, single point: all the things you say the characters are doing wrong WERE IN FACT WRONG. The theme of BSG is “humans are fallible creatures who will frak up perfectly well on their own.” Not “disobeying the rule of law is good.”

    If you continue watching the show, you will in fact find out that the characters, for various reasons, do find redemption (of a sort; Galactica DOES have a rather downbeat world view) and realize they are making mistakes. In fact, you are not very many episodes away from the turning point for at least one major character.

    I realize that, inherently, commenting on something as you watch it is going to lead to these sort of moments. But without spoiling the show-yeah, you’re a little off base on what it’s ultimately about.

    Reply

  6. Tom P #

    I think one thing you have to take is that in a post-apocalyptic society, things like “conservative” and “liberal” cease to matter very much. It becomes more about survival and, as people struggle to grasp why they were spared from a genocide I think many of them will go to God ‘n Guns. Starbuck is torturing a Cylon because the Cylons, as a group, just wiped out every human being who existed save for the number written on President Roslin’s board. These same Cylons are pursuing this number, probably, to murder them, too. Philosophical objections fall to the wayside when survival instinct kicks in and I don’t believe, if you were responsible to protect the last 45,000 souls in the known universe, that you wouldn’t pull out all the stops to protect them.

    And further — they ARE robots. I think the writers enjoyed that dichotomy. Ask yourself — would anyone in the Star Trek universe feel guilty for torturing a Borg? Probably not because they all share the same group-think so, in effect, they’re all guilty or, at the very least, silent co-conspirators. For all anyone knows at this point of the series, the Cylon-hybrids are simply programmed to outwardly simulate a pain response to make the humans divide themselves in this kind of petty argument while a baseship catches up to finish the job.

    Reply

  7. Tom P #

    Oh, also — I’d suggest giving it the balance of this season if I were you. The Finale of season 2.0 plus the beginning of season 2.5 hooked me for good…. though it really never does become less heavy.

    Reply

  8. mlawski OTI Staff #

    @Tom P: Good points. It’s interesting that you bring up Star Trek, since that show really cemented my views on the civil rights of robots. For me, the question isn’t, “Would you torture a Borg?” but “Would you torture Data?” Naturally, the answer has to be no. I love that fracking robot. Him and his cat named Spot.

    Reply

  9. Lisa #

    The downbeat tone of the show came through quite clearly in the commercials, which is why I never watched the show. :)

    That being said, I did read the Mistborn trilogy. It sounds like it handles some of the same themes of politics in a post-apocalyptic situation (or I suppose possibly just apocalpytic in Mistborn’s case) and does so with a better sense of humor than BSG. One thing I have noticed in several post-apocalyptic books and movies is that the author basically mimics the fall of the Soviet Union in their work. In order to maintain stability, the government has to be come autocratic. Democracy just doesn’t work, because the people don’t actually want a say in how things work, they just want them TO work. Russia has NEVER had a democracy. It obviously didn’t know what to do with one when it got it.

    I don’t know if that would necessarily be the case if, for example, disaster struck the US. How likely is the average Joe going to be to sit idly by while some guy or gal with a few good ideas decides they have to be in charge indefinitely? With the shadow of George Washington hanging over them, who would dare to not relinquish control of their office? (And they shouldn’t get Putin’s option of just taking the other high office in the government.)

    I don’t know, personally, but I think it would make an interesting exploration.

    Reply

  10. Tom P #

    @mlawski: Data is an even better example, though. We know he can’t feel pain. We know he can’t feel emotion. But he could certainly duplicate a very convincing pain response to make everyone feel guilty about doing it.

    Even further — his torturers could threaten to kill Spot unless Data gives them information. He could simulate a grovelling response for a sufficient amount of time and then tell them some creative lie that leads them in the wrong direction. But, pre-chip, he won’t (and can’t) feel anything if they actually kill Spot.

    Reply

  11. mlawski OTI Staff #

    @Tom P: Ah, whoops. I did mean to say “Data with his emotion chip turned on.” Although I guess there must be other ways to torture someone who can’t feel. Maybe give him an impossible math problem any watch his head explode?

    Anyway, Tom, you’re proving my point. Whether or not a robot is “torture-able,” the information you get out of them through torture is likely to be false. If they do feel and are in great pain, they’ll say anything to make the pain stop (like humans do), and, if they’re just pretending to feel pain, then the torture is useless, anyway. So why even do it? (In my book “revenge” is not an acceptable answer.)

    Reply

  12. Tom P #

    @mlawski: Because that’s what the military knows how to do. It’s also very easy to dissociate yourself from what you’re doing when you consider them robots. It’s like hitting the refrigerator because it died and all your food spoiled.

    It goes back to the post-apocalyptic thing. All of these things are happening like 30 days after a genocide the likes of which we can’t even conceptualize. It’s hard to imagine that any of these people are really thinking straight. I think it’s far less believable that any one of them would sit down for a civilized conversation. Again, I don’t think it’s a liberal vs. conservative thing — I think it’s a trying to survive extinction thing.

    And if you want someone to root for. Follow Helo.

    Reply

  13. K-Brack #

    I think it’s important to remember the reality of the situation that these characters are living in before we harshly criticize them. I highly doubt Adama would condone a military coup of the government for a single bad decision made during peace time when human civilization has yet to be destroyed. However, human civilization has been destroyed and the colonists are at war. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and if that means ignoring the whims of the uninformed masses and not participating in silly tribunals, all the power to Adama. Also, the stakes of this war should be taken into account. The Cylons attempted and damn near accomplished genocide of the human race, and are still at it. If torturing a Cylon is what it takes to save the human race, I’d say the ends justify the means. This isn’t a war between two countries for resources here…this is survival. When the implications become that grievous we lose the ability to compare it to our reality and have it remain an apt metaphor.

    Reply

  14. chris #

    Remember that these characters have just had to sit and watch while almost everybody they ever knew on their worlds where systematically destroyed. At the point where Starbuck is torturing Leoben she thinks that there were no survivors. There is a powerful fleet following them and seeking to wipe out the last vestages of humanity, this man/robot has been feeding it information to make sure that she, and all the other humans, ends up dead. In the Startrek TNG universe (to take the leading Social-Democratic Sci-Fi) a lead character might be able to put all of that aside, but a normal human would not and the fact that she cannot makes her a more beleivable character. The fact that she is afterwards troubled by what she has to do gives her a depth I often found missing in most Startrek characters. I’ve got to agree with Tom P if you want more of an ‘Enemy Mine’ story then follow Helo/Sharon.

    Reply

Add a Comment