When is a rogue not a rogue? When he's Jack Bauer.

When is a rogue not a rogue? When he’s Jack Bauer.

Breaking the rules in a methodical and systematic sort of way.

jack-bauer-the-rogueTwenty Four is in full swing (I’ve spelled out the number to comply with Overthinking It’s copious style guidelines), which means it’s time for the annual spring tradition – going rogue.

For the uninitiated, “going rogue” is the process by which defense, intelligence, counterintelligence and law enforcement professionals begin a shift of active duty. It is the third step in the standard U.S. government four-step defense, intelligence, counterintelligence and law enforcement operating procedure (or S.U.S. FSICCLEO).

What is S.U.S. FSICCLEO, and what does it tell us about what we think about order?

By my estimation, S.U.S. FSICCLEO goes a little something like this:

Step 1 – Get hired: A government agency recognizes that you’ve got the talent, the skills and the guts to do what it takes to protect the people of the United States. Also, you are probably a mole. Congrats, you’re now affiliated with the U.S. government!

How far am I willing to go? I'm willing to do whatever it takes. I'll go all the way. I'll push the limits. I'll do what this country needs me to do. How far are you willing to go? How about happy hour at Bennigan's?

How far am I willing to go? I'm willing to do whatever it takes. I'll go all the way. I'll push the limits. I'll do what this country needs me to do. How far are you willing to go? How about happy hour at Bennigan's?

Step 2 – Get briefed: Through several terse hours of heart-stopping exposition and B- and C-plots, you find out your basic job duties, where the supply closet is, and why the whole country/world is going to explode.  Two key things you need to find out in any good briefing:

  • The president is the worst president ever.
  • Everyone in the world falls into three groups – computer geniuses, people you are going to kill/torture, and incompetents.

Step 3 – Go rogue: Congratulations! Now that you’re a full-fledged member of the U.S. government, it’s time to do your job! The first thing you’re going to want to do here is sever all ties with the U.S. government. The government prefers it this way, because then it doesn’t have to pay for your health insurance. This is, incidentally, why B.A. Baracus always has trouble purchasing antibiotics.

The best agents learn to go rogue in teams, coordinating their logistics and efforts and keeping down costs while simulataneously all going rogue in different directions.

The best agents learn to go rogue in teams, joining forces, coordinating logistics and keeping down costs while going rogue from their mutual employer and from each other at the same time.

Step 4 – Go too far: Since, as a rogue, your resources are going to be very limited and you’ll be fighting upstream, striking at a secret and mighty enemy while being held back by the very people you’ve sworn to protect, when a project approaches completion, you’re going to have to go too far. If you haven’t gone too far yet, you’re probably still in the process of going rogue. If you aren’t going rogue, and you haven’t gone too far, you need to go back to step 1. If you haven’t gone through step 1 DAMMIT I DON’T HAVE TIME TO EXPLAIN IT RIGHT NOW, JUST TELL ME WHERE HE IS!

Working for the government is fun for the whole family!

Working for the government is fun for the whole family!

REPEAT STEP 1 – After you successfully go too far and save the United States from a complex web of terror, deceit and corruption at the highest levels of government, you’ll probably get noticed by the government. They will probably decide that they’re not saying you haven’t done some “objectionable things,” but innocent Americans are dying, and you are the best shot they’ve got.

Key takeaways
The most important thing to remember is that, in the world of 24, if you’re going rogue, you’re following the rules and standard procedure, whereas if you’re following the rules and standard procedure, you are making a radical, dangerous departure from the status quo. That is why, whenever somebody goes rogue in 24, it’s comforting, a release of tension.

He's like a modern day Sir Galahad, except instead of abstaining from sex, he abstains from regulations and codes of conduct.

He's like a modern day Sir Galahad, except instead of abstaining from sex, he abstains from regulations and codes of conduct.

It inspires the mentally attuning quality of your train’s first slow roll off the platform – or the first time you actually get somebody to buy one of those boxes of cookies your extracurricular activity at school is making you sell. There’s a sense that you’re on your way – that things are going the way they are supposed to go. God is in his heaven, Jack Bauer is yelling and connecting somebody to a car battery, and all is right with the world.

We all know that police chief desks exist mainly so you have a place to put your badge and your gun before you go out and hunt criminals.

As Thomas Jefferson told us, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” That is why the U.S. government only employs people who are willing to go outside the law and do whatever it takes. And also why it bought that noisy yellow clock.

"I said 'Go ROGUE,' dammit! 'ROGUE!'"

"I said 'Go ROGUE,' dammit! 'ROGUE!'"

7 Comments on “When is a rogue not a rogue? When he’s Jack Bauer.”

  1. mlawski OTI Staff #

    I was gonna go rogue but then I decided to go paladin.

    Reply

  2. lauren r #

    Hilarious post.

    My friend Alan (who you know because he was in Stiles with you) and I have theorized a Platonic ideal of a person called Jack. You get the best sense of the inherent qualities of “Jack” if you mix Jack Bauer, MacGuyver, Han Solo, Rick Blaine, and a wide variety of people who hold the rank/title of Captain (Jack Sparrow, Kara Thrace, Malcolm Reynolds, James T. Kirk, etc.). It involves a heavy dose of “not playing by the rules but still getting the job done”, some “making the absolute optimal use of your giving surroundings or situation”, and a fair share of “thinking 3 steps ahead of anyone else”.

    Some day, when we both have endless amounts of free time, we’re going to do a study and co-write a paper.

    Reply

  3. Gab #

    Fenzel: Is this an “I’m making fun of this because it annoys the sh** out of me” kind of post, or an “I’m making fun of this because I love it so much” one?

    Is there a difference between going rogue and going vigilante?

    Mlwaski- LOL

    Reply

  4. fenzel #

    @Gab –

    We all pick up little phrases from the people we date over the years, and I think a phrase I picked up from one of my first girlfriends answers your question very well –

    “A little bit of Column A, a little bit of Column B.”

    And yes, there is a difference. Going rogue implies that you were once officially employed or accredited to do the thing you are now doing independently. Going vigilante doesn’t carry that implication – a civilian can go vigiliante as easily as a police officer.

    Also, vigilantism involves a narrower sort of activity – you have to pretty much be a crimefighter to be a vigilante. As we’ve seen in 24, going rogue can involve anything from fighting terrorists to looking up phone numbers when your boss isn’t looking.

    So, vigiliantism involves a larger subset of a practitioners, but a smaller subset of actions.

    @ Lauren

    If you are still in Boston, we need to hang out! This delay is inexcusable! :-)

    Reply

  5. lee OTI Staff #

    Fenzel, I know you’re not a fan of this word, but I dare say that your post is indicative of an *earonic* appreciation for 24

    Reply

  6. Gab #

    @Lee: Yeah, earony was probably the word I was looking for.

    Reply

  7. fenzel #

    @Lee

    Grr.

    You know why I hate that word?

    Because it takes two different standpoints that often coexist in parallel and insists that they constitue one standpoint.

    People and art are multideterministic. There are a lot of different things happening at the same time that have to share space. Reducing complex interactions like those between ironic and sincere enjoyments into linear continua cheapens the analysis and ignores much of the value of art.

    Reply

Add a Comment